Sep 22

Advertising agencies often have the worst websites in the world. There is something about the combination of the massive egos, the ‘big idea’, and the discovery that they can make things move around the screen interactively that tends to lead to disaster.

Recently I heard Ogilvy had launched their new global website: ogilvy.com. I first visited it in trepidation. What horrors await? But it turned out to be seriously awesome.

The best thing about it: it’s all about the user rather than being all about Ogilvy. It brings together uniqueness and relevance to create awesomeness. This sounds so incredibly simple but it is critically important and so many people get it wrong. The site is almost entirely focused on the ideas and writing that come from the 18,000 Ogilvy employees around the world, rather than being all about the business itself. Which do you think their potential clients and employees are more interested in?

So they got the strategy right. They also got the execution right in a number of impressive ways. The site has a very flat structure and very clever navigation, allowing you to access a whole range of content with very few clicks. They’ve used minimal animation, and built the Flash in a best-practice way allowing you to bookmark or email URLs for individual pages. They’ve used lots of big text which makes always makes things look cool. It loads quickly. It doesn’t make your eyes hurt or your head spin. The site even works in the text-only browser on my old Blackberry which is extremely unusual for an agency site.

These are tough times for the advertising industry. Agencies are facing down a financial crisis that is driving clients to slash budgets and expect more for their remaining dollars. At the same time consumers are spending more and more time on the internet, and making advertising work online requires very a different mindset and approach. The models that have worked since the Mad Men era aren’t working anymore, and no one knows quite how to fix them. There couldn’t be a more important time for Ogilvy to be leading the industry through its online presence.

I was thrilled to see one of my blog posts on their homepage, “Stark Realisation”. I do work for an Ogilvy company so I could just be sucking up to the mothership. But I’m not nearly that devious. Check out the site and decide for yourself.

Filed under:

 
  • Print
  • Comments (10)
die-strategy------die
die-strategy------die 24 Sep 2009

Hey Alex, can you say a-g-e-n-c-y___p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a? And which bit is about the user?Sheesh, what a load of ----. Smell the excrement ...... Where does it talk about Ogilvy's customers and how Ogilvy is going to make them money - not use their budgets to win crappy advertising awards. Back in your box....

Alex Campbell
DTDigital 24 Sep 2009

I've edited the profanity out of the above comment. We welcome open discussion as long as it is not rude!

Ogilvy makes money for its clients through ideas, and constantly has to prove the business results that these ideas generate. Their new site is all about expressing their ideas. I don't see any disconnect at all.

Cheers, Alex

die-strategy@$&*(#-die
24 Sep 2009

The disconnect is simple, Alex. This site is about ... "expressing their (Ogilvy's) ideas" not as you originally stated in your post that "The best thing about it: it’s all about the user rather than being all about Ogilvy."

Let's be honest. It's about Ogilvy leveraging their staff and their staff's profiles to sell Ogilvy's services (not that selling your services is a bad thing). If it was all about Ogilvy's current and prospective customers (the users) it would provide customisation capabilities, targeted and personalised communications and sector specific marketing insights that would really add value to the end user.

It's a 'pretty' website promoting Ogilvy's services. It's better than most global agency websites, but as you inferred, that's really not that hard.

Let's just not make it out to be any more than just that.

Alex Campbell
DTDigital 25 Sep 2009

What's the problem with Ogilvy leveraging their staff and their staff's profiles to sell their services? This is how professional services organisations work. Check out McKinsey Quarterly (http://mckinseyquarterly.com) and see how they do it.

Also remember that getting featured on the ogivy.com homepage helps build the staff member's personal brand just as much as it helps Ogilvy. A lot of clever people are now leveraging the exposure they get from corporate blogs to get new, better jobs.

I agree the ogilvy.com site could benefit from personalisation and targeting. I'll mention this to the team in NY but I'd bet they are already thinking about it. In the meantime I still think they have one of (if not the) best agency websites in the world.

This is an interesting discussion but I'd find it much more interesting if you'd drop the cloak of anonymity so I know who I'm talking with. If you're ever in Melbourne then come by our office for a beer and we can continue the conversation!

die-strategy------die
25 Sep 2009

Let's not change the topic. You've contradicted yourself, you said the Ogilvy website was all about the user, it clearly isn't, and now you've gone off on a tangent about personal branding. Clients don't care about how you are leveraging a corporate blog to get a new and better job.

Thanks for the invite but I really can't be bothered walking down to your desk.

Alex Campbell
DTDigital 25 Sep 2009

The site is all about the user. It's all about giving the user great ideas, for free. How is this inconsistent or contradictory?

I only brought up the point about personal branding because you had a problem with Ogilvy leveraging their staff's writing and profile to sell their services. My point is that the staff benefit from this as much as Ogilvy does.

Anyway, why are you not prepared to have this conversation without hiding behind anonymity?

Benedict
BRM Web Consulting 28 Sep 2009

Hi Alex

I am happy to go on record as hating this new site. Like you I find most marketing agency websites very self-obsessed and probably even poorly made and out of date.

This one is new and different but I look at it and have to try to decode what it is all about. I'm not interested in how clever the graphic artists are. I want to know what I want, fast and easily. This doesn't help me do that at all. The pages of random words is a barrier to my using the site.

It is an interesting experiment however and if someone can explain to me how it really works and then show me stats that prove that most users love then I will change my stance.

:-)

Tony
28 Sep 2009

I couldn't agree with Chris and Benedict more. The site is a massive barrier for open communicate - frankly it's incredible hard to understand. The typical 'colouring in' approach taken here (and continues to plague digital channels) really doesn't surprise me - especially when it involves the creative (where is the business strategy?) suits in ad land. As for the debate on who's the end user, let's face it - it's themselves Alex. Their big egos and big ideas sing through here - with just a dash of creative flair!

Chris
28 Sep 2009

Confusion plus for the end user - whoever that is? I thought Telstra was the only one that loved their own propaganda - nice try Alex.

Alex Campbell
DTDigital 28 Sep 2009

Thanks Benedict, Tony and Chris for the comments. I appreciate you guys getting into the discussion here!

Personally I find the homepage easy to navigate, and I actually prefer their approach than having multiple layers of navigation to get into the content. I think it's a clever and effective way to bring their best / most current content to the top in a simple structure, while differentiating the content visually through the different fonts.

As a user overall I really like the site, which is why I wrote this post in the first place. It's certainly MUCH better than any agency group website I've ever seen. But I have found it interesting to hear from you about your impressions of the site.

I'm just one of 18,000 Ogilvy employees around the world and I don't have access to their stats or any influence at all over what they do. I'm sure they're keeping a close eye on feedback and analytics on the new site. I'm looking forward to seeing what they do next. From my perspective they're on the right track.

Return to our Insight blog