Jul 15

The metcard is the current ticketing system for trams and trains in Melbourne. I take the odd tram, which means that every few weeks I need to buy a new metcard.  What’s it like buying a metcard? It’s a pain in the ass.

Here’s why: there are about 28 different kinds of metcards, each covering a combination of different travel zones, concessions rates, number of trips on the card and so on. Like most people, I always buy the same variety. My personal metcard of choice is the “two hour, ten trip, zone one, full fare metcard”. In order to buy this metcard, I need to give five pieces of information to the salesperson. Here’s a typical conversation (in which I only remember three of the required parameters)“

Hi, can I get a 2 hour ten trip metcard?”
“Yep is that zone one?”
“Oh yeah zone one”
“Full fare?”
“Ah right yeah, full fare”
“OK that will be $29.40”

I don’t think I’ve successfully recited these five pieces of information correctly ever. I don’t think anyone else has either. Cause every time I’m buying a metcard, I see other people having the same problem.

I can’t think of anything else in the world that I need five pieces of information to buy. In the non-metcard world, when you need to use five terms to describe something, you come up with a new name. Have you ever wondered how IKEA name their furniture? They definitely don't call it the "131cm ceiling spotlight lamp with 5 bulbs", they call it the "Barometer". In fact, they have a pretty sophisticated system for naming their products.

So here’s what I propose for metcards - a naming system based on fruits:

  • The “two hour, ten trip, zone one, full fare metcard” becomes the “banana metcard”.
  • The “two hour, ten trip, zone one and two, concession metcard” becomes the “apple metcard”
  • The “daily, five trip, zone one, full fare metcard” becomes the “lemon metcard”

And so on. The colour of the fruit reflects the colour of the zones (zone 1 is yellow, zone two is blue, zones one and two combined can be green). I could go on, but you get the point.

Whoever is in charge of metcards hasn't thought through the whole user journey (including the act of purchasing). The consequence is that every day, thousands of people waste their precious minutes buying metcards. Pretty trivial right? Who cares if it takes a few extra seconds? Well it all adds up. Every extra annoyance makes me feel a little bit worse about spending that $29.40. Don't make your customers feel that way - make sure someone is thinking about the user experience end to end.

Footnote: if you are a Melburnian, you will know that the metcard is soon to be obsolete, it’s being replaced by a new system which has been “almost ready” for the past few years. But that’s not really the point :)

Filed under:

 
  • Print
  • Comments (5)
Bryce
Mulberry Marketing Communications 15 Jul 2010

Hi Ollie,

Just came across this blog and, as an ex-Melbourne boy now living in London, it made me laugh quite a bit. So much so, in fact, that I got some weird looks in the office here this morning. Anyway mate, keep up the good work and look forward to reading more in future.

Cheers,

Bryce

Andy
DTDigital 17 Jul 2010

Have you used one of the myki top-up machines? They're harder to use than the Metcard ones.

Phil
21 Jul 2010

But this system wouldn't make it easier for everyone. It would become more difficult for 'Authorised Officers' and 'Customer Service Representatives' to fine and intimidate loyal customers.

Arthur
PrepaidPlans 9 Aug 2010

The more options you give people the harder the decision making becomes. The new system will atleast allow you to add money to your card and then swipe it and it should work out what to charge you (hoping it always gets it right).

Working through a similar problem at the mometn with a new product and how we can bundle services together to make packages rather than a baffet style.

In terms of your fruit analogy, the problem with fruit is that quickly the word lemon will come up and you have set yourself up for it.

Ollie
DTDigital 9 Aug 2010

Thanks for the comments :)

Definitely agree about the "paradox of choice", I've been reading about that a lot lately. I think in this particular case though, quick decision making isn't really the real issue since often that decision is only made once (when you move house for example). From then you're just repeating the same purchase.

The fruit naming is just an example which may not be perfect, but does satisfy a few of the criteria for good naming systems, i.e. it can be logically mapped to products (zones), it's got room for expansion, it's using everyday language so it's memorable etc etc.

Return to our Insight blog